Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., on Wednesday pressed Attorney General Merrick Garland to provide an explanation for his pondering at the back of a debatable 2021 memorandum directing the Justice Department to analyze violent threats to university body of workers.
The wondering got here throughout the Senate Judiciary Committee’s “Oversight of the Department of Justice” listening to.
“Didn’t you understand the chilling effect that it would have [on] parents when you issued your directive? When you directed your criminal and counterterrorism divisions to investigate parents who were angry at school boards and administrators during COVID?” Kennedy requested.
Garland driven again, pronouncing his directive clarified that oldsters’ First Amendment rights had been safe. The legal professional normal prominent between those that threatened college board individuals with violence, and people who simply complained to their college board.
AG GARLAND CLAIMS FBI HAS PUT ‘FULL RESOURCES’ INTO TRACKING ATTACKS ON PRO-LIFE CENTERS, DESPITE FEW ARRESTS
“And [the directive] came in the context of a whole series of other kinds of violent threats and violence against other public officials,” Garland mentioned.
Angry folks, lashing out in school board conferences around the nation, captured headlines for far of 2021. Many had been bored to death with COVID-19 restrictions and their damaging affects on their kid’s schooling.
The National School Boards Association despatched President Biden a letter in September 2021 equating the movements of a few folks as “a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes.”
Less than every week later, Garland wrote a one-page memo to the FBI, workplaces for U.S. legal professionals, and the DOJ’s Criminal Division to inform officers that the company would “use its authority and resources to identify threats at school board meetings against faculty, and “prosecute them when suitable.” The word “mum or dad” was never mentioned in the document.
CRUZ, ROY DEMAND ANSWERS FROM GARLAND ON FBI ALLEGEDLY SECRETLY RECORDING PROGRESSIVE ANTI-ABORTION GROUP
“What did you suppose was once going to occur?” Kennedy asked Garland on Wednesday.
The Louisiana Republican challenged Garland’s assertion that the memo was intended to prevent threats of violence and not investigate “offended folks.”
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland delivers remarks at the U.S. Justice Department Building on November 18, 2022, in Washington, DC. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
“This is concerning the 3rd I’m being requested about the similar memorandum. And every time I’ve mentioned, and I am hoping that the senators would move forward and advise their constituents in the similar approach that this isn’t what we do,” Garland said. “We don’t seem to be by any means looking to intrude with folks making proceedings concerning the schooling in their kids.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Last September, a federal judge threw out a lawsuit from Virginia and Michigan parents who sued Garland over the memo. Trump-appointed Judge Dabney Friedrich wrote, “the coverage does now not label any person a home terrorist, because the plaintiffs counsel.”
Fox News’ David Spunt and Brooke Singman contributed to this report.